Skip to content

Spending by county and region

Where the spenders are seated, how much that comes to per person, and where the work is done.

Figures cover: 2018–2026, all years · CPV 853

The county is the one of the authority's seat, so Bucharest also gathers the spending of ministries and national companies. Spending per person and place of performance show what lies beyond the seat.

  • The period is not over: the data runs to September 2026, and the figures will grow with the next update.
  • 2018 is incomplete: direct purchases appear in the data only from April.
  • Late December 2023 is missing from the data (29–31 December and part of 22 December).

The largest authorities in OLT

The list follows the period, not the contract type or the CPV code.

Stream amounts lead to the purchases they were added up from. Direct purchases and offline purchases give the exact amount. For tenders, the notices of the period open, by main CPV code: the amount in the table is the contracts', dated at signature and split across lots.

Direct
Direct purchases from the electronic catalogue.
Offline
Offline purchases: direct purchases made outside the catalogue.
Tenders
Tender contracts.
Total
The three streams added up: everything the authority spent in the chosen period. The list is ordered by this column.

How it is computed

County
The county is the one of the authority's seat, from the trade register. That is why Bucharest looks so large: ministries and national companies, which buy for the whole country, are seated there.
Population
Spend per person divides the amount by the resident population on 1 January of the chosen year. Over all years the amount is cumulative and divided by the latest year's population.
Development regions
The eight NUTS 2 regions are the sum of their counties.
Place of performance
Each tender lot has a place of performance. The table compares the money spent by the authorities seated in a county with the money for work performed there; money declared at regional or national level has no county and is counted separately.

Every county

Every county
County Region Population Direct purchases Offline purchases Tenders Total Lei per person Share
BUCUREȘTI Bucharest-Ilfov 1,713,832 13,306,918 1,988,300 375,019,047 390,314,265 228 48.1%
ARAD West 410,058 1,817,179 55,596 49,089,580 50,962,355 124 6.3%
MUREȘ Centre 519,813 7,177,028 3,633,241 36,098,153 46,908,422 90 5.8%
TIMIȘ West 672,972 6,080,839 1,893,194 30,036,484 38,010,517 56 4.7%
ALBA Centre 324,901 1,923,448 19,180 34,387,489 36,330,117 112 4.5%
BIHOR North-West 558,623 3,798,773 117,959 29,595,408 33,512,140 60 4.1%
SIBIU Centre 396,679 2,487,422 936,599 23,289,484 26,713,505 67 3.3%
CĂLĂRAȘI South-Muntenia 277,347 3,245,066 69,724 17,706,540 21,021,330 76 2.6%
HARGHITA Centre 292,267 10,282,377 3,970,116 4,880,285 19,132,778 65 2.4%
SATU MARE North-West 330,046 9,736,336 5,741,830 1,964,000 17,442,166 53 2.2%
DÂMBOVIȚA South-Muntenia 475,812 1,851,985 280,377 14,330,401 16,462,763 35 2.0%
MARAMUREȘ North-West 451,086 1,063,705 349,312 9,524,287 10,937,304 24 1.4%
COVASNA Centre 199,596 5,705,654 3,704,804 330,015 9,740,473 49 1.2%
VRANCEA South-East 330,157 6,901,905 31,452 — 6,933,357 21 0.9%
BACĂU North-East 590,169 6,121,330 618,499 — 6,739,829 11 0.8%
CLUJ North-West 701,564 2,898,444 402,088 2,917,720 6,218,252 9 0.8%
GORJ South-West Oltenia 306,938 1,178,334 1,843,484 2,540,125 5,561,943 18 0.7%
SUCEAVA North-East 648,164 3,271,165 33,445 2,234,240 5,538,850 9 0.7%
BRAȘOV Centre 564,632 4,503,219 289,407 88,160 4,880,786 9 0.6%
CARAȘ-SEVERIN West 240,283 4,105,509 704,084 — 4,809,593 20 0.6%
ILFOV Bucharest-Ilfov 619,461 3,462,506 — 1,172,520 4,635,026 7 0.6%
NEAMȚ North-East 444,666 3,261,691 149,952 907,968 4,319,611 10 0.5%
SĂLAJ North-West 210,335 2,847,456 485,530 — 3,332,986 16 0.4%
OLT South-West Oltenia 372,181 3,264,180 24,100 — 3,288,280 9 0.4%
IALOMIȚA South-Muntenia 247,409 2,910,087 303,564 — 3,213,651 13 0.4%
GALAȚI South-East 486,387 1,508,016 789,238 900,065 3,197,319 7 0.4%
HUNEDOARA West 349,011 2,959,035 21,576 172,054 3,152,665 9 0.4%
CONSTANȚA South-East 656,512 2,277,371 568,889 — 2,846,260 4 0.4%
ARGEȘ South-Muntenia 561,864 1,388,591 1,055,279 — 2,443,870 4 0.3%
TELEORMAN South-Muntenia 308,440 2,423,327 1,453 — 2,424,780 8 0.3%
PRAHOVA South-Muntenia 683,460 2,134,143 117,007 — 2,251,150 3 0.3%
DOLJ South-West Oltenia 594,523 2,078,703 170,509 — 2,249,212 4 0.3%
IAȘI North-East 781,948 1,731,470 426,762 — 2,158,232 3 0.3%
BISTRIȚA-NĂSĂUD North-West 298,129 1,448,902 695,253 — 2,144,155 7 0.3%
BUZĂU South-East 393,136 1,998,392 45,437 — 2,043,829 5 0.3%
TULCEA South-East 186,131 673,603 13,500 1,242,813 1,929,916 10 0.2%
VÂLCEA South-West Oltenia 337,988 1,462,333 322,964 89,815 1,875,112 6 0.2%
BOTOȘANI North-East 386,529 1,402,663 6,719 — 1,409,382 4 0.2%
VASLUI North-East 363,247 1,258,831 134,472 — 1,393,303 4 0.2%
MEHEDINȚI South-West Oltenia 226,429 1,268,439 9,734 — 1,278,173 6 0.2%
GIURGIU South-Muntenia 258,793 592,013 2,500 — 594,513 2 0.1%
BRĂILA South-East 269,804 486,135 92,737 — 578,872 2 0.1%

Per person: all years added up, against the resident population on 1 January 2026.

Stream amounts lead to the purchases they were added up from. Direct purchases and offline purchases give the exact amount. For tenders, the notices of the period open, by main CPV code: the amount in the table is the contracts', dated at signature and split across lots.

County
The county of the authority's seat. The name opens the county's largest authorities.
Region
The development region (NUTS 2) the county belongs to.
Population
Resident population on 1 January.
Direct purchases
Direct purchases from the electronic catalogue.
Offline purchases
Offline purchases: direct purchases made outside the catalogue.
Tenders
Tender contracts.
Total
The three streams added up: all the county's authorities spent.
Lei per person
The total divided by the population. The only column that compares counties of different size.
Share
The county's part of the national total for the chosen filters.

Where it is spent and where it is performed: tenders

Tender money, once by the seat of the authority that spent it and once by the county where the lot is performed. A positive difference means more is performed in the county than its authorities spend.

Where it is spent and where it is performed: tenders
County Spent by the county's authorities Performed in the county Difference
BUCUREȘTI 375,019,055 286,075,655 −88,943,400
ARAD 49,089,580 49,089,580 0
MUREȘ 36,098,153 37,370,900 +1,272,747
ALBA 34,387,489 34,387,489 0
GIURGIU 0 31,351,462 +31,351,462
TIMIȘ 30,036,484 30,356,392 +319,908
BIHOR 29,595,408 29,595,408 0
SIBIU 23,289,484 19,481,249 −3,808,235
BUZĂU 0 17,952,869 +17,952,869
CĂLĂRAȘI 17,706,540 16,374,540 −1,332,000
DÂMBOVIȚA 14,330,401 14,314,401 −16,000
MARAMUREȘ 9,524,287 6,413,632 −3,110,655
HARGHITA 4,880,285 4,880,285 0
ILFOV 1,172,520 3,406,760 +2,234,240
CLUJ 2,917,720 2,917,720 0
GORJ 2,540,125 2,094,810 −445,315
SATU MARE 1,964,000 1,964,000 0
TULCEA 1,242,813 1,242,813 0
GALAȚI 900,065 900,065 0
IAȘI 0 648,000 +648,000
COVASNA 330,015 330,015 0
NEAMȚ 907,968 259,968 −648,000
HUNEDOARA 172,054 163,654 −8,400
VÂLCEA 89,815 89,815 0
BRAȘOV 88,160 88,160 0
VRANCEA 0 0 0
BACĂU 0 0 0
SUCEAVA 2,234,240 0 −2,234,240
CARAȘ-SEVERIN 0 0 0
SĂLAJ 0 0 0
OLT 0 0 0
IALOMIȚA 0 0 0
CONSTANȚA 0 0 0
ARGEȘ 0 0 0
TELEORMAN 0 0 0
PRAHOVA 0 0 0
DOLJ 0 0 0
BISTRIȚA-NĂSĂUD 0 0 0
BOTOȘANI 0 0 0
VASLUI 0 0 0
MEHEDINȚI 0 0 0
BRĂILA 0 0 0

Another 46.77 Mn. (7.3% of tender money) are declared at regional or national level or abroad, and have no county.

  • The period is not over: the data runs to September 2026, and the figures will grow with the next update.
  • 2018 is incomplete: direct purchases appear in the data only from April.
  • Late December 2023 is missing from the data (29–31 December and part of 22 December).
Spent by the county's authorities
Tender money spent by the authorities seated in the county, wherever the lot is performed.
Performed in the county
Tender money for lots performed in the county, whoever bought them. Money declared at regional or national level has no county and is counted separately, under the table.
Difference
Performed minus spent. Positive: more is performed in the county than its authorities spend, usually through national investment. Negative: its authorities buy work performed elsewhere.

The same data, through the API

Every figure on this page comes from the public API, through the endpoints below. The parameters each one takes are in the documentation; each needs an access key.

  • /api/v1/stats/dimensions
  • /api/v1/stats/periods
  • /api/v1/stats/breakdown
  • /api/v1/stats/lots
  • /api/v1/stats/top/authorities

Open data and API