Skip to content

Spending by county and region

Where the spenders are seated, how much that comes to per person, and where the work is done.

Figures cover: 2018–2026, all years · CPV 322

The county is the one of the authority's seat, so Bucharest also gathers the spending of ministries and national companies. Spending per person and place of performance show what lies beyond the seat.

  • The period is not over: the data runs to September 2026, and the figures will grow with the next update.
  • 2018 is incomplete: direct purchases appear in the data only from April.
  • Late December 2023 is missing from the data (29–31 December and part of 22 December).

The largest authorities in ILFOV

The list follows the period, not the contract type or the CPV code.

Stream amounts lead to the purchases they were added up from. Direct purchases and offline purchases give the exact amount. For tenders, the notices of the period open, by main CPV code: the amount in the table is the contracts', dated at signature and split across lots.

Direct
Direct purchases from the electronic catalogue.
Offline
Offline purchases: direct purchases made outside the catalogue.
Tenders
Tender contracts.
Total
The three streams added up: everything the authority spent in the chosen period. The list is ordered by this column.

How it is computed

County
The county is the one of the authority's seat, from the trade register. That is why Bucharest looks so large: ministries and national companies, which buy for the whole country, are seated there.
Population
Spend per person divides the amount by the resident population on 1 January of the chosen year. Over all years the amount is cumulative and divided by the latest year's population.
Development regions
The eight NUTS 2 regions are the sum of their counties.
Place of performance
Each tender lot has a place of performance. The table compares the money spent by the authorities seated in a county with the money for work performed there; money declared at regional or national level has no county and is counted separately.

Every county

Every county
County Region Population Direct purchases Offline purchases Tenders Total Lei per person Share
BUCUREȘTI Bucharest-Ilfov 1,713,832 42,167,577 9,597,264 203,535,133 255,299,974 149 57.4%
CONSTANȚA South-East 656,512 4,460,787 447,731 29,081,725 33,990,243 52 7.6%
CLUJ North-West 701,564 8,282,211 772,678 7,922,209 16,977,098 24 3.8%
SIBIU Centre 396,679 4,991,722 300,816 8,655,604 13,948,142 35 3.1%
DOLJ South-West Oltenia 594,523 5,948,610 429,793 3,415,575 9,793,978 16 2.2%
ILFOV Bucharest-Ilfov 619,461 7,111,299 235,552 1,629,549 8,976,400 14 2.0%
IAȘI North-East 781,948 4,019,877 131,258 4,715,452 8,866,587 11 2.0%
BRAȘOV Centre 564,632 4,410,764 296,430 2,839,232 7,546,426 13 1.7%
TIMIȘ West 672,972 4,710,112 154,590 1,024,720 5,889,422 9 1.3%
BIHOR North-West 558,623 3,274,810 329,196 704,471 4,308,477 8 1.0%
SATU MARE North-West 330,046 2,231,180 97,710 1,761,649 4,090,539 12 0.9%
PRAHOVA South-Muntenia 683,460 2,789,683 151,295 1,099,179 4,040,157 6 0.9%
HARGHITA Centre 292,267 2,794,867 354,238 764,424 3,913,529 13 0.9%
SĂLAJ North-West 210,335 3,250,072 5,756 618,266 3,874,094 18 0.9%
BACĂU North-East 590,169 2,663,415 29,071 801,129 3,493,615 6 0.8%
MARAMUREȘ North-West 451,086 2,658,040 134,296 564,597 3,356,933 7 0.8%
ARAD West 410,058 1,931,745 64,785 1,318,233 3,314,763 8 0.8%
SUCEAVA North-East 648,164 2,975,192 26,705 285,702 3,287,599 5 0.7%
MUREȘ Centre 519,813 2,881,397 50,067 276,975 3,208,439 6 0.7%
GORJ South-West Oltenia 306,938 1,892,529 112,515 1,070,746 3,075,790 10 0.7%
VRANCEA South-East 330,157 2,300,825 10,900 758,145 3,069,870 9 0.7%
ARGEȘ South-Muntenia 561,864 2,021,681 13,307 736,775 2,771,763 5 0.6%
GALAȚI South-East 486,387 2,323,615 137,422 267,223 2,728,260 6 0.6%
OLT South-West Oltenia 372,181 2,519,384 28,986 139,720 2,688,090 7 0.6%
ALBA Centre 324,901 1,915,231 45,159 694,506 2,654,896 8 0.6%
GIURGIU South-Muntenia 258,793 1,191,227 1,151 1,323,828 2,516,206 10 0.6%
BRĂILA South-East 269,804 2,086,165 37,664 374,664 2,498,493 9 0.6%
BUZĂU South-East 393,136 1,744,812 64,489 635,688 2,444,989 6 0.6%
NEAMȚ North-East 444,666 1,272,674 20,398 1,137,234 2,430,306 5 0.6%
HUNEDOARA West 349,011 2,311,853 18,890 60,925 2,391,668 7 0.5%
DÂMBOVIȚA South-Muntenia 475,812 2,087,930 11,629 268,126 2,367,685 5 0.5%
TELEORMAN South-Muntenia 308,440 2,153,552 94 60,079 2,213,725 7 0.5%
VÂLCEA South-West Oltenia 337,988 1,890,223 53,763 — 1,943,986 6 0.4%
BOTOȘANI North-East 386,529 1,308,431 54,519 222,100 1,585,050 4 0.4%
IALOMIȚA South-Muntenia 247,409 1,408,283 2,207 129,300 1,539,790 6 0.4%
VASLUI North-East 363,247 903,039 82,654 364,932 1,350,625 4 0.3%
MEHEDINȚI South-West Oltenia 226,429 1,101,402 — 221,827 1,323,229 6 0.3%
COVASNA Centre 199,596 891,482 6,880 373,456 1,271,818 6 0.3%
CĂLĂRAȘI South-Muntenia 277,347 1,226,079 19,760 24,477 1,270,316 5 0.3%
TULCEA South-East 186,131 967,613 4,404 — 972,017 5 0.2%
CARAȘ-SEVERIN West 240,283 864,147 6,114 — 870,261 4 0.2%
BISTRIȚA-NĂSĂUD North-West 298,129 513,844 96,083 — 609,927 2 0.1%

Per person: all years added up, against the resident population on 1 January 2026.

Stream amounts lead to the purchases they were added up from. Direct purchases and offline purchases give the exact amount. For tenders, the notices of the period open, by main CPV code: the amount in the table is the contracts', dated at signature and split across lots.

County
The county of the authority's seat. The name opens the county's largest authorities.
Region
The development region (NUTS 2) the county belongs to.
Population
Resident population on 1 January.
Direct purchases
Direct purchases from the electronic catalogue.
Offline purchases
Offline purchases: direct purchases made outside the catalogue.
Tenders
Tender contracts.
Total
The three streams added up: all the county's authorities spent.
Lei per person
The total divided by the population. The only column that compares counties of different size.
Share
The county's part of the national total for the chosen filters.

Where it is spent and where it is performed: tenders

Tender money, once by the seat of the authority that spent it and once by the county where the lot is performed. A positive difference means more is performed in the county than its authorities spend.

Where it is spent and where it is performed: tenders
County Spent by the county's authorities Performed in the county Difference
BUCUREȘTI 203,535,133 189,069,521 −14,465,612
CONSTANȚA 29,081,725 35,748,257 +6,666,532
SIBIU 8,655,604 8,655,604 0
CLUJ 7,922,208 7,885,960 −36,248
IAȘI 4,715,452 4,720,598 +5,146
DOLJ 3,415,575 3,452,031 +36,456
BRAȘOV 2,839,232 2,842,535 +3,303
SATU MARE 1,761,649 1,761,649 0
PRAHOVA 1,099,179 1,697,606 +598,427
NEAMȚ 1,137,234 1,404,584 +267,350
ARAD 1,318,233 1,318,233 0
SUCEAVA 285,702 1,153,765 +868,063
TIMIȘ 1,024,720 1,058,875 +34,155
GIURGIU 1,323,828 1,056,478 −267,350
BACĂU 801,129 801,129 0
GORJ 1,070,746 799,038 −271,708
ALBA 694,507 774,255 +79,748
HARGHITA 764,425 764,425 0
VRANCEA 758,145 758,145 0
ARGEȘ 736,775 736,775 0
BIHOR 704,471 704,471 0
MARAMUREȘ 564,597 674,997 +110,400
CARAȘ-SEVERIN 0 638,000 +638,000
BUZĂU 635,688 635,688 0
SĂLAJ 618,266 598,607 −19,659
BOTOȘANI 222,100 553,924 +331,824
BRĂILA 374,664 374,664 0
COVASNA 373,456 373,456 0
VASLUI 364,932 364,932 0
GALAȚI 267,223 311,342 +44,119
MUREȘ 276,975 276,975 0
DÂMBOVIȚA 268,126 268,126 0
MEHEDINȚI 221,827 221,827 0
OLT 139,720 139,720 0
ILFOV 1,629,549 129,649 −1,499,900
HUNEDOARA 60,925 60,925 0
TELEORMAN 60,079 60,079 0
CĂLĂRAȘI 24,477 34,527 +10,050
VÂLCEA 0 0 0
IALOMIȚA 129,300 0 −129,300
TULCEA 0 0 0
BISTRIȚA-NĂSĂUD 0 0 0

Another 7.00 Mn. (2.5% of tender money) are declared at regional or national level or abroad, and have no county.

  • The period is not over: the data runs to September 2026, and the figures will grow with the next update.
  • 2018 is incomplete: direct purchases appear in the data only from April.
  • Late December 2023 is missing from the data (29–31 December and part of 22 December).
Spent by the county's authorities
Tender money spent by the authorities seated in the county, wherever the lot is performed.
Performed in the county
Tender money for lots performed in the county, whoever bought them. Money declared at regional or national level has no county and is counted separately, under the table.
Difference
Performed minus spent. Positive: more is performed in the county than its authorities spend, usually through national investment. Negative: its authorities buy work performed elsewhere.

The same data, through the API

Every figure on this page comes from the public API, through the endpoints below. The parameters each one takes are in the documentation; each needs an access key.

  • /api/v1/stats/dimensions
  • /api/v1/stats/periods
  • /api/v1/stats/breakdown
  • /api/v1/stats/lots
  • /api/v1/stats/top/authorities

Open data and API