Skip to content

Spending by county and region

Where the spenders are seated, how much that comes to per person, and where the work is done.

Figures cover: 2018–2026, all years · CPV 312

The county is the one of the authority's seat, so Bucharest also gathers the spending of ministries and national companies. Spending per person and place of performance show what lies beyond the seat.

  • The period is not over: the data runs to September 2026, and the figures will grow with the next update.
  • 2018 is incomplete: direct purchases appear in the data only from April.
  • Late December 2023 is missing from the data (29–31 December and part of 22 December).

The largest authorities in CLUJ

The list follows the period, not the contract type or the CPV code.

Stream amounts lead to the purchases they were added up from. Direct purchases and offline purchases give the exact amount. For tenders, the notices of the period open, by main CPV code: the amount in the table is the contracts', dated at signature and split across lots.

Direct
Direct purchases from the electronic catalogue.
Offline
Offline purchases: direct purchases made outside the catalogue.
Tenders
Tender contracts.
Total
The three streams added up: everything the authority spent in the chosen period. The list is ordered by this column.

How it is computed

County
The county is the one of the authority's seat, from the trade register. That is why Bucharest looks so large: ministries and national companies, which buy for the whole country, are seated there.
Population
Spend per person divides the amount by the resident population on 1 January of the chosen year. Over all years the amount is cumulative and divided by the latest year's population.
Development regions
The eight NUTS 2 regions are the sum of their counties.
Place of performance
Each tender lot has a place of performance. The table compares the money spent by the authorities seated in a county with the money for work performed there; money declared at regional or national level has no county and is counted separately.

Every county

Every county
County Region Population Direct purchases Offline purchases Tenders Total Lei per person Share
BUCUREȘTI Bucharest-Ilfov 1,713,832 46,412,793 10,997,754 156,359,740 213,770,287 125 25.6%
MUREȘ Centre 519,813 2,413,787 2,292,447 155,357,069 160,063,303 308 19.2%
CLUJ North-West 701,564 9,887,874 1,330,400 133,944,453 145,162,727 207 17.4%
DOLJ South-West Oltenia 594,523 2,857,601 879,245 107,068,044 110,804,890 186 13.3%
BRAȘOV Centre 564,632 8,328,276 1,767,494 47,414,857 57,510,627 102 6.9%
PRAHOVA South-Muntenia 683,460 2,631,310 486,836 14,641,573 17,759,719 26 2.1%
IAȘI North-East 781,948 14,457,378 142,712 446,769 15,046,859 19 1.8%
GORJ South-West Oltenia 306,938 813,507 892,014 9,818,901 11,524,422 38 1.4%
SIBIU Centre 396,679 3,294,266 442,582 5,649,329 9,386,177 24 1.1%
ILFOV Bucharest-Ilfov 619,461 5,929,061 130,108 2,503,442 8,562,611 14 1.0%
CONSTANȚA South-East 656,512 6,600,836 1,567,442 281,768 8,450,046 13 1.0%
TIMIȘ West 672,972 5,955,832 512,961 981,155 7,449,948 11 0.9%
HUNEDOARA West 349,011 1,525,892 341,638 4,150,772 6,018,302 17 0.7%
BIHOR North-West 558,623 2,207,296 241,520 2,804,710 5,253,526 9 0.6%
BRĂILA South-East 269,804 1,316,543 10,099 3,814,189 5,140,831 19 0.6%
BOTOȘANI North-East 386,529 1,709,478 138,008 2,289,655 4,137,141 11 0.5%
ARGEȘ South-Muntenia 561,864 4,024,690 70,291 — 4,094,981 7 0.5%
BACĂU North-East 590,169 3,603,431 253,989 215,270 4,072,690 7 0.5%
GALAȚI South-East 486,387 2,483,417 990,062 426,180 3,899,659 8 0.5%
VÂLCEA South-West Oltenia 337,988 2,918,173 467,657 338,088 3,723,918 11 0.5%
SUCEAVA North-East 648,164 2,627,206 68,653 809,738 3,505,597 5 0.4%
ALBA Centre 324,901 3,048,615 34,285 — 3,082,900 9 0.4%
BUZĂU South-East 393,136 2,252,101 20,788 99,729 2,372,618 6 0.3%
NEAMȚ North-East 444,666 1,879,957 60,196 — 1,940,153 4 0.2%
OLT South-West Oltenia 372,181 1,659,994 5,723 212,021 1,877,738 5 0.2%
MARAMUREȘ North-West 451,086 1,478,873 27,499 75,600 1,581,972 4 0.2%
SATU MARE North-West 330,046 1,343,973 103,508 — 1,447,481 4 0.2%
BISTRIȚA-NĂSĂUD North-West 298,129 1,403,823 13,368 — 1,417,191 5 0.2%
VRANCEA South-East 330,157 1,262,850 100,086 — 1,362,936 4 0.2%
HARGHITA Centre 292,267 781,551 215,242 339,000 1,335,793 5 0.2%
VASLUI North-East 363,247 946,669 31,618 314,000 1,292,287 4 0.2%
DÂMBOVIȚA South-Muntenia 475,812 1,235,738 39,664 — 1,275,402 3 0.2%
ARAD West 410,058 949,452 290,356 — 1,239,808 3 0.2%
CĂLĂRAȘI South-Muntenia 277,347 1,018,247 202,725 — 1,220,972 4 0.2%
IALOMIȚA South-Muntenia 247,409 945,500 33,527 135,660 1,114,687 5 0.1%
SĂLAJ North-West 210,335 376,606 34,651 698,562 1,109,819 5 0.1%
TELEORMAN South-Muntenia 308,440 1,082,602 21,197 — 1,103,799 4 0.1%
TULCEA South-East 186,131 848,383 100,270 — 948,653 5 0.1%
MEHEDINȚI South-West Oltenia 226,429 789,625 19,405 — 809,030 4 0.1%
COVASNA Centre 199,596 786,640 9,982 — 796,622 4 0.1%
GIURGIU South-Muntenia 258,793 675,328 36,131 — 711,459 3 0.1%
CARAȘ-SEVERIN West 240,283 451,147 7,406 — 458,553 2 0.1%

Per person: all years added up, against the resident population on 1 January 2026.

Stream amounts lead to the purchases they were added up from. Direct purchases and offline purchases give the exact amount. For tenders, the notices of the period open, by main CPV code: the amount in the table is the contracts', dated at signature and split across lots.

County
The county of the authority's seat. The name opens the county's largest authorities.
Region
The development region (NUTS 2) the county belongs to.
Population
Resident population on 1 January.
Direct purchases
Direct purchases from the electronic catalogue.
Offline purchases
Offline purchases: direct purchases made outside the catalogue.
Tenders
Tender contracts.
Total
The three streams added up: all the county's authorities spent.
Lei per person
The total divided by the population. The only column that compares counties of different size.
Share
The county's part of the national total for the chosen filters.

Where it is spent and where it is performed: tenders

Tender money, once by the seat of the authority that spent it and once by the county where the lot is performed. A positive difference means more is performed in the county than its authorities spend.

Where it is spent and where it is performed: tenders
County Spent by the county's authorities Performed in the county Difference
MUREȘ 155,357,069 129,790,316 −25,566,753
CLUJ 133,944,454 111,631,236 −22,313,218
DOLJ 107,068,044 107,336,002 +267,958
BUCUREȘTI 156,359,745 73,772,996 −82,586,749
BRAȘOV 47,414,856 54,598,246 +7,183,390
PRAHOVA 14,641,573 14,973,573 +332,000
IAȘI 446,769 11,793,650 +11,346,881
ILFOV 2,503,442 10,742,811 +8,239,369
CONSTANȚA 281,768 10,246,761 +9,964,993
BIHOR 2,804,710 6,943,345 +4,138,635
SIBIU 5,649,329 5,239,535 −409,794
HUNEDOARA 4,150,772 4,958,826 +808,054
MARAMUREȘ 75,600 4,003,353 +3,927,753
GORJ 9,818,902 3,932,127 −5,886,775
BRĂILA 3,814,189 3,814,189 0
SĂLAJ 698,562 3,341,453 +2,642,891
VÂLCEA 338,086 2,793,851 +2,455,765
BOTOȘANI 2,289,655 2,289,655 0
BACĂU 215,270 2,023,210 +1,807,940
ALBA 0 1,787,980 +1,787,980
GALAȚI 426,180 1,598,507 +1,172,327
OLT 212,021 1,417,730 +1,205,709
NEAMȚ 0 1,358,836 +1,358,836
MEHEDINȚI 0 1,314,341 +1,314,341
SATU MARE 0 1,052,747 +1,052,747
TIMIȘ 981,155 1,042,717 +61,562
SUCEAVA 809,740 832,082 +22,342
ARGEȘ 0 582,928 +582,928
HARGHITA 339,000 339,000 0
VASLUI 314,000 314,000 0
DÂMBOVIȚA 0 281,922 +281,922
TULCEA 0 264,000 +264,000
IALOMIȚA 135,660 135,660 0
BUZĂU 99,729 99,729 0
BISTRIȚA-NĂSĂUD 0 0 0
VRANCEA 0 0 0
ARAD 0 0 0
CĂLĂRAȘI 0 0 0
TELEORMAN 0 0 0
COVASNA 0 0 0
GIURGIU 0 0 0
CARAȘ-SEVERIN 0 0 0

Another 74.54 Mn. (11.4% of tender money) are declared at regional or national level or abroad, and have no county.

  • The period is not over: the data runs to September 2026, and the figures will grow with the next update.
  • 2018 is incomplete: direct purchases appear in the data only from April.
  • Late December 2023 is missing from the data (29–31 December and part of 22 December).
Spent by the county's authorities
Tender money spent by the authorities seated in the county, wherever the lot is performed.
Performed in the county
Tender money for lots performed in the county, whoever bought them. Money declared at regional or national level has no county and is counted separately, under the table.
Difference
Performed minus spent. Positive: more is performed in the county than its authorities spend, usually through national investment. Negative: its authorities buy work performed elsewhere.

The same data, through the API

Every figure on this page comes from the public API, through the endpoints below. The parameters each one takes are in the documentation; each needs an access key.

  • /api/v1/stats/dimensions
  • /api/v1/stats/periods
  • /api/v1/stats/breakdown
  • /api/v1/stats/lots
  • /api/v1/stats/top/authorities

Open data and API