Skip to content

Spending by county and region

Where the spenders are seated, how much that comes to per person, and where the work is done.

Figures cover: 2018–2026, all years · CPV 092

The county is the one of the authority's seat, so Bucharest also gathers the spending of ministries and national companies. Spending per person and place of performance show what lies beyond the seat.

  • The period is not over: the data runs to September 2026, and the figures will grow with the next update.
  • 2018 is incomplete: direct purchases appear in the data only from April.
  • Late December 2023 is missing from the data (29–31 December and part of 22 December).

The largest authorities in BRAȘOV

The list follows the period, not the contract type or the CPV code.

Stream amounts lead to the purchases they were added up from. Direct purchases and offline purchases give the exact amount. For tenders, the notices of the period open, by main CPV code: the amount in the table is the contracts', dated at signature and split across lots.

Direct
Direct purchases from the electronic catalogue.
Offline
Offline purchases: direct purchases made outside the catalogue.
Tenders
Tender contracts.
Total
The three streams added up: everything the authority spent in the chosen period. The list is ordered by this column.

How it is computed

County
The county is the one of the authority's seat, from the trade register. That is why Bucharest looks so large: ministries and national companies, which buy for the whole country, are seated there.
Population
Spend per person divides the amount by the resident population on 1 January of the chosen year. Over all years the amount is cumulative and divided by the latest year's population.
Development regions
The eight NUTS 2 regions are the sum of their counties.
Place of performance
Each tender lot has a place of performance. The table compares the money spent by the authorities seated in a county with the money for work performed there; money declared at regional or national level has no county and is counted separately.

Every county

Every county
County Region Population Direct purchases Offline purchases Tenders Total Lei per person Share
BUCUREȘTI Bucharest-Ilfov 1,713,832 26,676,123 9,836,234 73,381,610 109,893,967 64 28.8%
SIBIU Centre 396,679 4,089,892 1,058,914 45,924,584 51,073,390 129 13.4%
GORJ South-West Oltenia 306,938 1,171,668 675,976 22,918,574 24,766,218 81 6.5%
CONSTANȚA South-East 656,512 12,182,220 883,129 7,411,694 20,477,043 31 5.4%
ILFOV Bucharest-Ilfov 619,461 4,883,706 163,793 12,703,124 17,750,623 29 4.6%
CLUJ North-West 701,564 4,269,134 1,175,722 11,247,771 16,692,627 24 4.4%
IAȘI North-East 781,948 8,498,240 621,862 4,774,553 13,894,655 18 3.6%
TIMIȘ West 672,972 5,310,901 794,305 6,944,380 13,049,586 19 3.4%
PRAHOVA South-Muntenia 683,460 3,004,300 258,727 6,837,241 10,100,268 15 2.6%
DOLJ South-West Oltenia 594,523 4,697,240 1,177,237 2,445,647 8,320,124 14 2.2%
GALAȚI South-East 486,387 4,043,164 930,121 2,737,361 7,710,646 16 2.0%
BACĂU North-East 590,169 3,169,793 242,506 4,196,388 7,608,687 13 2.0%
BRAȘOV Centre 564,632 4,663,280 572,272 2,264,871 7,500,423 13 2.0%
HUNEDOARA West 349,011 2,312,681 396,595 4,640,780 7,350,056 21 1.9%
BUZĂU South-East 393,136 3,960,905 83,377 2,491,792 6,536,074 17 1.7%
VÂLCEA South-West Oltenia 337,988 2,119,121 1,015,886 3,063,667 6,198,674 18 1.6%
MUREȘ Centre 519,813 3,233,766 937,264 1,226,330 5,397,360 10 1.4%
ARGEȘ South-Muntenia 561,864 3,768,687 219,885 492,560 4,481,132 8 1.2%
VRANCEA South-East 330,157 3,348,175 77,323 — 3,425,498 10 0.9%
BIHOR North-West 558,623 1,852,990 367,613 1,127,553 3,348,156 6 0.9%
BOTOȘANI North-East 386,529 2,794,797 57,953 34,132 2,886,882 7 0.8%
SUCEAVA North-East 648,164 1,781,731 168,375 764,460 2,714,566 4 0.7%
NEAMȚ North-East 444,666 1,508,484 71,567 930,649 2,510,700 6 0.7%
SATU MARE North-West 330,046 2,115,564 173,222 — 2,288,786 7 0.6%
CĂLĂRAȘI South-Muntenia 277,347 1,578,414 172,310 532,820 2,283,544 8 0.6%
VASLUI North-East 363,247 2,133,076 95,609 — 2,228,685 6 0.6%
MARAMUREȘ North-West 451,086 1,949,413 150,884 — 2,100,297 5 0.6%
TELEORMAN South-Muntenia 308,440 1,802,244 74,585 — 1,876,829 6 0.5%
BRĂILA South-East 269,804 1,815,471 20,138 — 1,835,609 7 0.5%
DÂMBOVIȚA South-Muntenia 475,812 1,607,468 81,005 109,254 1,797,727 4 0.5%
COVASNA Centre 199,596 1,738,692 34,250 — 1,772,942 9 0.5%
ARAD West 410,058 1,548,119 196,173 — 1,744,292 4 0.5%
TULCEA South-East 186,131 1,316,198 31,395 2,000 1,349,593 7 0.4%
IALOMIȚA South-Muntenia 247,409 990,290 162,554 — 1,152,844 5 0.3%
OLT South-West Oltenia 372,181 1,085,469 36,755 — 1,122,224 3 0.3%
SĂLAJ North-West 210,335 1,089,240 21,189 — 1,110,429 5 0.3%
BISTRIȚA-NĂSĂUD North-West 298,129 978,537 124,292 — 1,102,829 4 0.3%
GIURGIU South-Muntenia 258,793 949,635 120,301 — 1,069,936 4 0.3%
HARGHITA Centre 292,267 956,794 67,685 — 1,024,479 4 0.3%
ALBA Centre 324,901 939,963 56,633 — 996,596 3 0.3%
MEHEDINȚI South-West Oltenia 226,429 871,269 17,098 — 888,367 4 0.2%
CARAȘ-SEVERIN West 240,283 845,885 8,727 — 854,612 4 0.2%

Per person: all years added up, against the resident population on 1 January 2026.

Stream amounts lead to the purchases they were added up from. Direct purchases and offline purchases give the exact amount. For tenders, the notices of the period open, by main CPV code: the amount in the table is the contracts', dated at signature and split across lots.

County
The county of the authority's seat. The name opens the county's largest authorities.
Region
The development region (NUTS 2) the county belongs to.
Population
Resident population on 1 January.
Direct purchases
Direct purchases from the electronic catalogue.
Offline purchases
Offline purchases: direct purchases made outside the catalogue.
Tenders
Tender contracts.
Total
The three streams added up: all the county's authorities spent.
Lei per person
The total divided by the population. The only column that compares counties of different size.
Share
The county's part of the national total for the chosen filters.

Where it is spent and where it is performed: tenders

Tender money, once by the seat of the authority that spent it and once by the county where the lot is performed. A positive difference means more is performed in the county than its authorities spend.

Where it is spent and where it is performed: tenders
County Spent by the county's authorities Performed in the county Difference
BRAȘOV 2,264,871 42,759,542 +40,494,671
SIBIU 45,924,583 27,278,167 −18,646,416
BUCUREȘTI 73,381,609 19,834,034 −53,547,575
GORJ 22,918,577 13,439,837 −9,478,740
CLUJ 11,247,772 11,458,122 +210,350
MUREȘ 1,226,330 10,119,118 +8,892,788
CONSTANȚA 7,411,694 9,468,174 +2,056,480
TIMIȘ 6,944,380 8,499,891 +1,555,511
PRAHOVA 6,837,244 7,034,295 +197,051
BACĂU 4,196,388 5,770,418 +1,574,030
IAȘI 4,774,553 4,751,761 −22,792
HUNEDOARA 4,640,777 4,687,090 +46,313
VÂLCEA 3,063,667 3,133,387 +69,720
DOLJ 2,445,647 2,947,255 +501,608
GALAȚI 2,737,361 2,737,361 0
BUZĂU 2,491,792 2,634,073 +142,281
SUCEAVA 764,460 2,600,403 +1,835,943
NEAMȚ 930,649 1,901,257 +970,608
VRANCEA 0 1,397,054 +1,397,054
BIHOR 1,127,553 1,127,553 0
ARGEȘ 492,561 1,017,810 +525,249
ARAD 0 688,168 +688,168
MEHEDINȚI 0 664,000 +664,000
CĂLĂRAȘI 532,820 540,309 +7,489
ALBA 0 389,038 +389,038
DÂMBOVIȚA 109,253 277,998 +168,745
CARAȘ-SEVERIN 0 211,890 +211,890
SATU MARE 0 104,592 +104,592
BOTOȘANI 34,132 70,295 +36,163
ILFOV 12,703,121 15,359 −12,687,762
TULCEA 2,000 2,000 0
VASLUI 0 0 0
MARAMUREȘ 0 0 0
TELEORMAN 0 0 0
BRĂILA 0 0 0
COVASNA 0 0 0
IALOMIȚA 0 0 0
OLT 0 0 0
SĂLAJ 0 0 0
BISTRIȚA-NĂSĂUD 0 0 0
GIURGIU 0 0 0
HARGHITA 0 0 0

Another 31.64 Mn. (14.4% of tender money) are declared at regional or national level or abroad, and have no county.

  • The period is not over: the data runs to September 2026, and the figures will grow with the next update.
  • 2018 is incomplete: direct purchases appear in the data only from April.
  • Late December 2023 is missing from the data (29–31 December and part of 22 December).
Spent by the county's authorities
Tender money spent by the authorities seated in the county, wherever the lot is performed.
Performed in the county
Tender money for lots performed in the county, whoever bought them. Money declared at regional or national level has no county and is counted separately, under the table.
Difference
Performed minus spent. Positive: more is performed in the county than its authorities spend, usually through national investment. Negative: its authorities buy work performed elsewhere.

The same data, through the API

Every figure on this page comes from the public API, through the endpoints below. The parameters each one takes are in the documentation; each needs an access key.

  • /api/v1/stats/dimensions
  • /api/v1/stats/periods
  • /api/v1/stats/breakdown
  • /api/v1/stats/lots
  • /api/v1/stats/top/authorities

Open data and API