Skip to content

Authorities and suppliers

Who buys, who sells, and how they are linked.

Size

A few hold most of the money

Entities split by their money over the whole period: what share of them falls in each band, and what share of the money. Each band opens in the list, filtered to exactly that band.

Contracting authorities

157 authorities (0.86% of them) spent over a billion lei each — together, 59% of all the money.

Open in the list: under 100k · 100k–1M · 1–10M · 10–100M · 100M–1bn · over 1bn

The largest authorities, by spending

Open the list

Suppliers

112 suppliers (0.05% of them) were paid over a billion lei each — together, 35% of all the money.

Open in the list: under 100k · 100k–1M · 1–10M · 10–100M · 100M–1bn · over 1bn

The largest suppliers, by revenue

The largest suppliers, by revenue
# Supplier Total, all years
1 SPEDITION UMB SRL 18,719,019,384
2 SA & PE CONSTRUCT SRL 17,590,698,529
3 TEHNOSTRADE SRL 16,349,945,202
4 ALSTOM TRANSPORT SA 14,295,028,539
5 RHEINMETALL AUTOMECANICA SRL 13,928,759,312
6 CONSTRUCTII ERBASU SA 13,895,392,261
7 PORR CONSTRUCT SRL 13,084,757,135
8 ORIENT SRL 10,240,235,065
9 ARCADA COMPANY SA 7,882,089,003
10 CONCELEX SRL 6,566,340,875

Open the list

Who buys

Spending by type of authority

The money of all years, by type of authority. The number of authorities, the average and the flagged share appear on hovering a bar.

Most money goes through State companies: 1,315 authorities, 37% of the total. Most authorities, though, are Schools: 6,512, with only 1.5% of the money.

The type is inferred from the name, with the same classifier as the statistics section; almost all money lands in a precise category, not in Other.

Links

How many partners each has

A relationship is an authority and a supplier between which money moved, in any stream. The charts show how many partners each has and how much a supplier depends on its main client.

Clients per supplier

42% of suppliers sold to a single authority, yet took only 4.4% of the money.

Suppliers per authority

An authority works with 136 suppliers on average.

Dependence on the main client

Of 41,897 suppliers with at least ten clients, 1,546 (3.7%) take 80% or more from a single one.

Dependence is measured only for suppliers with at least 10 clients: with one buyer, a company depends on it entirely and the figure says nothing. Indicator #04, supplier captivity

The largest relationships

the 500 largest relationships, by money

The largest relationships
Contracting authority Supplier Direct purchases Offline purchases Tenders Total Of the company's revenue Of the authority's spend Period
VITAL SACUI: 9710087 EUSKADI SRL CUI: 17021083 —— 189,435,706 189,435,706 10.2% 14.7% 2024–2025
MUNICIPIUL GALATICUI: 3814810 ROVIS LIDER SRL CUI: 12430567 3,187,302 4,529,657 181,664,065 189,381,024 67.4% 6.4% 2018–2026
SPITALUL CLINIC COLTEACUI: 4192960 ROTEST SRL CUI: 13362371 —— 188,143,053 188,143,053 55.9% 8.0% 2020–2026
OMV PETROM SACUI: 1590082 WEATHERFORD ATLAS GIP SA CUI: 1360687 — 17,814 187,408,475 187,426,289 43.4% 8.9% 2018–2023
MUNICIPIUL GALATICUI: 3814810 CITADINA 98 SA CUI: 1634561 1,450,000 2,904,292 182,929,807 187,284,099 10.1% 6.3% 2018–2026
MUNICIPIUL BRASOVCUI: 4384206 BMC TRUCK & BUS SA CUI: 14442959 —— 187,070,400 187,070,400 9.8% 4.2% 2026
SOCIETATEA COMPLEXUL ENERGETIC OLTENIA SACUI: 30267310 UZINA ROMINEX SRL CUI: 26130306 — 5,265,714 181,534,074 186,799,788 92.0% 5.5% 2020–2026
COMPANIA REGIONALA DE APA BACAU SACUI: 27429315 CONEXTRUST SA CUI: 947730 132,507 27,302 185,879,967 186,039,776 17.2% 6.9% 2018–2025
DISTRIBUTIE ENERGIE OLTENIA SACUI: 14491102 EXIMPROD POWER SYSTEMS SA CUI: 14157812 —— 185,916,318 185,916,318 46.0% 5.4% 2019–2026
ADMINISTRATIA NATIONALA A REZERVELOR DE STAT SI PROBLEME SPECIALECUI: 26288978 BEST ACHIZITII SRL CUI: 32125703 —— 184,998,695 184,998,695 29.6% 19.5% 2022–2023
CT BUS SACUI: 188390213601991 ROMPETROL DOWNSTREAM SRL CUI: 12751583 —— 184,911,570 184,911,570 4.0% 65.5% 2019–2026
COMPANIA NATIONALA DE CAI FERATE CFR SA BUCURESTI SUCURSALA REGIONALA DE CAI FERATE IASICUI: 15670513 NESS PROIECT EUROPE SRL CUI: 27503616 —— 184,878,180 184,878,180 7.2% 15.2% 2023
CONSILIUL JUDETEAN IASI - DIRECTIA JUDETEANA DE ADMINISTRARE A DRUMURILOR SI PODURILOR IASICUI: 14009336 EKY-SAM SRL CUI: 9672080 24,000 — 184,385,281 184,409,281 35.3% 23.6% 2019–2025
SPITALUL CLINIC JUDETEAN DE URGENTA SFAPOSTOL ANDREI GALATICUI: 3126853 MEDIPLUS EXIM SRL CUI: 9311280 282,795 — 183,565,162 183,847,957 8.1% 22.2% 2018–2025
AQUAVAS SACUI: 17986823 MOTRIS COMPANY SRL CUI: 18672047 327,350 — 182,645,202 182,972,552 30.1% 14.1% 2019–2026
MUNICIPIUL BAIA MARECUI: 3627692 CONSTRUROM SA CUI: 16161089 3,275,360 — 179,417,163 182,692,523 42.1% 12.5% 2018–2026
SECTORUL 3 AL MUNICIPIULUI BUCURESTICUI: 4420465 GEVA CONSTRUCT AMBIENT SRL CUI: 31637470 4,384,656 — 177,794,551 182,179,207 91.9% 2.1% 2018–2026
MUNICIPIUL CLUJ-NAPOCACUI: 4305857 NORD CONFOREST SA CUI: 201900 445,141 — 181,709,283 182,154,424 28.5% 1.1% 2018–2025
SOCIETATEA COMPLEXUL ENERGETIC OLTENIA SACUI: 30267310 SOCIETATEA NATIONALA DE TRANSPORT FEROVIAR DE MARFA CFR - MARFA SA CUI: 11054537 — 645,758 181,369,936 182,015,694 50.5% 5.4% 2018–2025
MUNICIPIUL CLUJ-NAPOCACUI: 4305857 TCI CONTRACTOR GENERAL SA CUI: 199141 567,944 — 181,354,604 181,922,548 33.3% 1.1% 2018–2026
OFICIUL NATIONAL PENTRU ACHIZITII CENTRALIZATECUI: 39983313 PORSCHE ROMANIA SRL CUI: 9997007 —— 181,519,518 181,519,518 64.3% 2.3% 2023–2024
OFICIUL NATIONAL PENTRU ACHIZITII CENTRALIZATECUI: 39983313 VODAFONE ROMANIA SA CUI: 8971726 —— 180,972,306 180,972,306 4.4% 2.2% 2020–2026
ASOCIATIA DE DEZVOLTARE INTERCOMUNITARA ECO DUNAREA BRAILACUI: 25951818 PHG WASTE MANAGEMENT SRL CUI: 41561124 —— 180,574,275 180,574,275 99.9% 23.5% 2025
ASOCIATIA DE DEZVOLTARE INTERCOMUNITARA ECO DUNAREA BRAILACUI: 25951818 POLARIS MHOLDING SRL CUI: 12079629 —— 180,574,275 180,574,275 62.8% 23.5% 2025
JUDETUL SALAJCUI: 4494764 FRASINUL SRL CUI: 12337680 —— 180,138,719 180,138,719 12.0% 16.9% 2022–2026

426-450 of 500 results

Rows per page: 25 50 100

Each amount leads to the purchases it was computed from. For direct purchases and offline purchases the rows add up exactly to the figure; for tenders the notices the supplier won open, with the whole notice's value, not only its share.

Contracting authority
The authority that paid.
Supplier
The company that was paid. Indicator #04's symbol appears when the pair is a captivity case, and leads to it.
Direct purchases
Direct purchases between the two; the figure opens them.
Offline purchases
Offline purchases between the two; the figure opens them.
Tenders
The supplier's share of the authority's tender contracts; the figure opens the notices it won, at their full value.
Total
The three streams added up; the table is ordered by it by default.
Of the company's revenue
How much of the company's revenue comes from this authority. From 80% it reaches indicator #04's threshold.
Of the authority's spend
How much of the authority's spending went to this company.
Period
The first and last year money moved between the two.

Where they are

Money between counties

Authorities and suppliers by registered seat. Nationally, 42% of the money goes to suppliers in the same county as the authority paying.

Money between counties
County Spent by authorities Paid to suppliers Balance Kept in county
BUCUREȘTI 402,774,581,342 340,698,732,839 −62,075,848,503 50.3%
CLUJ 42,949,332,013 39,907,897,477 −3,041,434,536 28.7%
CONSTANȚA 29,971,401,003 19,736,689,281 −10,234,711,722 38.4%
PRAHOVA 27,122,941,960 21,827,406,721 −5,295,535,239 21.7%
ILFOV 26,932,907,256 45,509,761,947 +18,576,854,691 11.7%
IAȘI 25,715,520,872 30,161,901,088 +4,446,380,216 42.9%
SIBIU 22,917,346,144 39,178,703,255 +16,261,357,111 30.8%
DOLJ 22,619,657,602 17,228,954,392 −5,390,703,210 28.3%
TIMIȘ 22,326,446,958 22,867,879,218 +541,432,260 46.4%
BRAȘOV 20,047,550,734 23,021,454,340 +2,973,903,606 40.2%
BIHOR 19,601,643,054 20,740,206,617 +1,138,563,563 53.5%
MUREȘ 19,290,197,944 16,013,813,397 −3,276,384,547 35.1%
GALAȚI 17,528,009,138 28,545,197,443 +11,017,188,305 47.5%
SUCEAVA 16,555,747,029 15,940,734,645 −615,012,384 54.5%
BACĂU 15,431,849,067 66,626,729,575 +51,194,880,508 38.9%
HUNEDOARA 12,674,505,151 9,406,048,168 −3,268,456,983 45.3%
DÂMBOVIȚA 12,494,422,242 10,214,114,846 −2,280,307,396 27.6%
ARGEȘ 12,277,108,444 16,324,045,259 +4,046,936,815 48.5%
MARAMUREȘ 12,248,110,895 11,850,780,398 −397,330,497 42.9%
GORJ 12,024,206,616 6,132,498,500 −5,891,708,116 30.0%
ARAD 11,681,104,046 11,510,823,321 −170,280,725 48.1%
VÂLCEA 10,893,639,910 7,694,825,586 −3,198,814,324 31.8%
NEAMȚ 10,686,581,493 9,440,405,039 −1,246,176,454 38.4%
BUZĂU 10,292,445,454 20,605,729,865 +10,313,284,411 36.5%
OLT 10,154,687,706 11,331,404,190 +1,176,716,484 39.5%
ALBA 9,823,438,572 8,540,756,433 −1,282,682,139 49.0%
BISTRIȚA-NĂSĂUD 9,369,280,015 17,358,724,571 +7,989,444,556 55.9%
VRANCEA 9,155,330,404 4,007,668,377 −5,147,662,027 28.1%
SATU MARE 8,886,188,326 10,931,166,734 +2,044,978,408 37.5%
BOTOȘANI 8,809,291,749 15,557,225,293 +6,747,933,544 47.3%
VASLUI 8,683,401,647 6,096,072,302 −2,587,329,345 40.1%
HARGHITA 8,171,038,385 7,321,112,389 −849,925,996 57.4%
CARAȘ-SEVERIN 7,595,498,491 3,151,688,083 −4,443,810,408 26.1%
BRĂILA 7,516,549,893 5,303,965,853 −2,212,584,040 34.0%
TULCEA 7,279,698,710 4,866,466,475 −2,413,232,235 27.6%
CĂLĂRAȘI 6,768,441,994 4,288,688,751 −2,479,753,243 28.9%
MEHEDINȚI 6,341,112,523 4,863,367,424 −1,477,745,099 47.4%
TELEORMAN 6,164,463,561 3,910,833,905 −2,253,629,656 31.6%
GIURGIU 5,946,842,921 3,035,617,748 −2,911,225,173 16.9%
IALOMIȚA 5,916,514,854 4,042,859,532 −1,873,655,322 28.0%
SĂLAJ 5,559,311,281 5,313,741,007 −245,570,274 41.2%
COVASNA 4,912,076,832 3,003,731,947 −1,908,344,885 43.1%
County
The county of the seat; links to its statistics page.
Spent by authorities
Everything the authorities seated in the county paid to named suppliers, wherever those are.
Paid to suppliers
Everything the companies seated in the county were paid, by authorities anywhere.
Balance
Paid minus spent: positive where the county's companies received more than its authorities paid out. The sign is not a judgement: large companies' seats pull money towards their county.
Kept in county
How much of the county's authority spending went to suppliers in the same county; this is the map's colour.

Over time

How many are active each year

The authorities that spent and the suppliers that were paid each year, and the suppliers paid for the first time.

* A year the data does not cover in full: the first starts in April 2018, the last is not over. In the first year every supplier is new, so it has no newcomer bar.

Flags

Who is flagged, by size

The share of each size band flagged by at least one indicator and by three or more, as the indicator dashboard counts them.

Contracting authorities

Suppliers

A large entity makes more purchases and clears the minimum floors of more indicators, so a rising curve is partly volume, not only conduct. Indicator dashboard

The same data, through the API

Every figure on this page comes from the public API, through the endpoints below. The parameters each one takes are in the documentation; each needs an access key.

  • /api/v1/entities
  • /api/v1/red-flags/coverage
  • /api/v1/entities/bands
  • /api/v1/stats/top/authorities
  • /api/v1/stats/top/suppliers
  • /api/v1/entities/authority-types
  • /api/v1/stats/periods
  • /api/v1/entities/years
  • /api/v1/entities/counties
  • /api/v1/entities/relationships

Open data and API